| Jamie Dallaire on Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:03:22 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM reset |
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 16:46 -0500, Jamie Dallaire wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >wrote: > > > > > > > > I believe the entire original transaction fails because I couldn't > > > regain the MoM. So I didn't vacate, so nobody else had a shot. > > > > > > > Hmmmm now THAT is a paradox... Submitting actions at different future > times > > within a single transaction... We need to plug that ASAP. You only > vacated > > the MoM if you were able to regain it later. You were only able to regain > it > > later if no one took it in the interval. No one took it in the interval > only > > if you didn't vacate it. > Yep, my transaction in this thread would have been a paradox if the MoM > was vacated at the time. > > Because I love a good paradox: > > BEGIN TRANSACTION > At 21:55 UTC, I transfer m1 to comex. > At 21:55 UTC on December 10, 2199, I transfer m1 to comex. > END TRANSACTION > -- I think I found a way to deal with all this tomfoolery. It cannot be determined with certainty whether the 2199 game action (or all those at 00:00:00.5 and thereabouts) succeeds or fails. Therefore the transaction fails. BP _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss