Tyler on Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:51:09 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proto: Beating a dead horse |
Don't forget that entangled players and their platforms have an important relationship. (I didn't understand exactly what it is though.) So Platforms are referenced by a Rule. On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > /* Flavour, Entanglement, and Platforms still appear to have no > > rule-defined functions. Are they intended to be referenced > > by contracts? */ > > As the proposer of Platforms, the answer to that part at least is: > Yes. They're also intended to potentially be referenced by the rules. > > (And note that there are two contracts, the political parties, which > do reference Platforms: the Neo-Dadaist Alliance for Creampuff Rights > (which, in proper dadaist fashion, is against things found in its > members' platforms) and the Pocketbook Party (which makes it costly to > go against other members' platforms and profitable to have unpopular > stances in your own platform). I am the only member of either > contract, at the moment, but if that changes the interaction between > the two could get interesting. And by interesting I mean "the kind of > confusing only found in bureaucracies and nomics.") > > I intend, without objection, to cause the Operantly Conditioned Beast > to become bound by the Neo-Dadaist Alliance for Creampuff Rights. > > - teucer > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > -- -Tyler _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss