Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proto: Beating a dead horse

[Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>]

Don't forget that entangled players and their platforms have an important
relationship. (I didn't understand exactly what it is though.) So Platforms
are referenced by a Rule.

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > /* Flavour, Entanglement, and Platforms still appear to have no
> >   rule-defined functions.  Are they intended to be referenced
> >   by contracts? */
>
> As the proposer of Platforms, the answer to that part at least is:
> Yes. They're also intended to potentially be referenced by the rules.
>
> (And note that there are two contracts, the political parties, which
> do reference Platforms: the Neo-Dadaist Alliance for Creampuff Rights
> (which, in proper dadaist fashion, is against things found in its
> members' platforms) and the Pocketbook Party (which makes it costly to
> go against other members' platforms and profitable to have unpopular
> stances in your own platform). I am the only member of either
> contract, at the moment, but if that changes the interaction between
> the two could get interesting. And by interesting I mean "the kind of
> confusing only found in bureaucracies and nomics.")
>
> I intend, without objection, to cause the Operantly Conditioned Beast
> to become bound by the Neo-Dadaist Alliance for Creampuff Rights.
>
>  - teucer
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss