Re: [s-d] Proto: Beating a dead horse

Elliott Hird on Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:43:04 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Proto: Beating a dead horse

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] Proto: Beating a dead horse
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:42:55 +0000
In-reply-to: <491DF82D.3080309@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <491DF82D.3080309@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 14 Nov 2008, at 22:14, Ed Murphy wrote:

> /* Flavour, Entanglement, and Platforms still appear to have no
>    rule-defined functions.  Are they intended to be referenced
>    by contracts? */


Alas, even though I carried on the first paragraph's definition, we  
apparently suck at
continuity.

-- 
ehird

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] Proto: Beating a dead horse
  - From: Ed Murphy

Prev by Date: [s-d] Proto: Beating a dead horse
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Setting Things Up: Hello Hectomacks
Previous by thread: [s-d] Proto: Beating a dead horse
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proto: Beating a dead horse
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread