Re: [s-d] [s-b] panic

["Craig Daniel" <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:18 AM, Pavitra <celestialcognition@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 October 2008 11:07:35 pm Craig Daniel wrote:
>> 14. I submit a contract which contains an attempt to compel action
>> or inaction on the part of people who have not explicitly accepted
>> the contract's terms. (The contract should be invalid.)
>
> In this case, I think only the external compulsion should be
> invalidated, and the contract as a whole should stand. For example,
> if I were to create a contract along the lines of:
>
> {This is the Articles of Incorporation for Example Corp. The officer
> of Example is Pavitra. Within a jiffy after this corporation comes
> into existence, Pavitra and teucer are each obligated to transfer m5
> to comex.}
>
> then this should be binding on me but not you.
>
>
> Or, y'know, maybe not.

I would consider that an agreeable way of resolving it.

 - teucer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss