Jamie Dallaire on Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:34:11 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: MathFlag |
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Phil Ulrich <phil.ulrich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It would at the beginning of the next nweek, when it would go from p*x=x > to p*x=100x. That only applies to vacant ministries. Tyler wrote: > > What if I made p=the MoM's reward value? p*x would never be figured out! > (It > > would always be p*x=x.) > Then you'd be making the other team's life too easy! :-D The way to win MathFlag is NOT to decipher the other team's expression. The way to win MathFlag IS to be able to predict the result of the expression given a certain input (speaking of which, note to self, add in provision saying that expression values in the Challenge Stage are to be computed using the value of each "p" AT THE MOMENT THE CHALLENGE WAS ISSUED, rather than when computing occurs. Otherwise it'd be too easy for a team to go mess with a variable just to throw off the other team's guesses). So, if your p is 1, you might as well not have a p (which you're free to do, really). BP _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss