Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposaleering

[Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

A sub-game of one of these nomics annexed Canada recently, who didn't 
seem to mind.

Tyler wrote:
> What I want to know, however, is if this 'rule', if passed, could force
> people to choose between allegiance to Agora and allegiance to B Nomic. It
> seems like Agora could make a rule that the new partnership has to, I don't
> know, forsake all non-Agoran currency, so the Opted in will have to either
> give away their mack (and create/vote for proposals to remove mack in
> general) or be punished in Agora. Just an example. Is it reasonable to
> assume such implications are possible?
>
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 6:15 AM, ais523 <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   
>> On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 13:11 +0100, ehird wrote:
>>     
>>> Also, I did agree to "B Nomic" in Agora before, dunno if that actually
>>> worked, we never really paid much attention to it.
>>>       
>> There was once an Agoran contract whose text was identical to B's
>> ruleset (and therefore it claimed to be called B Nomic), but obviously
>> it wasn't B Nomic. As for whether it "actually worked", nobody ever
>> tried to enforce it, so we'll never know.
>> --
>> ais523
>>  _______________________________________________
>> spoon-discuss mailing list
>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss