Re: [s-d] [s-b] C Nomic repercussions

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

hey, I wrote British Columbia twice. Oops

On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I object without consequence to this motnw change.
>
> Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> This isn't the only paradox in the Duopoly Rule. If the nomics are
> >> identical, how can they have different names?
> >>
> >
> >
> > Because the current patriotic anthem that is our message of the nweek may
> > have the appearance of impartiality, and to avoid offending the
> > sensibilities of the partisans of C Nomic, I Intend, with Support, to
> Change
> > the Message of the nweek to:
> > {
> > C here, B cool. British Columbia. CB40. British Columbia. Before Christ.
> > Care Bear.
> > }
> >
> > This rule is going to be a Priest's nightmare. I recommend losing the
> >
> >> Ordained property if you want to avoid a headache.
> >>
> >
> >
> > I gain the Ordained Property.
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss