Jay Campbell on Wed, 1 Oct 2008 23:23:29 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] C Nomic repercussions


I object without consequence to this motnw change.

Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   
>> This isn't the only paradox in the Duopoly Rule. If the nomics are
>> identical, how can they have different names?
>>     
>
>
> Because the current patriotic anthem that is our message of the nweek may
> have the appearance of impartiality, and to avoid offending the
> sensibilities of the partisans of C Nomic, I Intend, with Support, to Change
> the Message of the nweek to:
> {
> C here, B cool. British Columbia. CB40. British Columbia. Before Christ.
> Care Bear.
> }
>
> This rule is going to be a Priest's nightmare. I recommend losing the
>   
>> Ordained property if you want to avoid a headache.
>>     
>
>
> I gain the Ordained Property.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss