Jay Campbell on Wed, 1 Oct 2008 23:23:29 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] C Nomic repercussions |
I object without consequence to this motnw change. Jamie Dallaire wrote: > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> This isn't the only paradox in the Duopoly Rule. If the nomics are >> identical, how can they have different names? >> > > > Because the current patriotic anthem that is our message of the nweek may > have the appearance of impartiality, and to avoid offending the > sensibilities of the partisans of C Nomic, I Intend, with Support, to Change > the Message of the nweek to: > { > C here, B cool. British Columbia. CB40. British Columbia. Before Christ. > Care Bear. > } > > This rule is going to be a Priest's nightmare. I recommend losing the > >> Ordained property if you want to avoid a headache. >> > > > I gain the Ordained Property. > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss