Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Have I been Punished?

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

Not that it matters in this case, but I'm pretty sure the unambiguous
identifier rule didn't come about till after nweek 135 :-p. Hence the
frantic panic button-mashing.

One more panic buttoner and we've got ourselves an emergency.

BP

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:07 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Elliott Hird wrote:
> > 2008/6/16 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >> It doesn't matter if you Chewbacca Defense, either, because Elliot Hird
> >> has not been ratified as a Player either.
> >>
> >
> > "Elliott", and I think you mean ehird.
> >
> If the name you get identified by is unique and unambiguous, no player
> need specify your actual Player Name. For instance, I was once
> 0x4461736864617368, but everyone else either called me 0x44 or copied
> the name from other emails. Since 0x44 uniquely identified me from other
> players, it counted as an unambiguous identifier.
>
> There are no other Elliots in the game, and no one else identifies by
> ehird, so "Elliot" is an unambiguous identifier for ehird.
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss