Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41

0x44 on Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:30:26 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:30:27 -0600
In-reply-to: <6d741b990801141715o58fa83c2gfbe1f3b132fda87d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <277041.36087.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f51c80d20801141641t1d502337j92bfb430d16070a9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f51c80d20801141644x1724f06xe1c4595846d3f6b9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990801141715o58fa83c2gfbe1f3b132fda87d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

Mike McGann wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2008 7:44 PM, Spencer Baugh <dominovo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> oops. Claim that to be Inconsistent, I accidentally didn't include the
>> entire Oracularity. Or is it still included even though it's quoted?
>>     
>
> Looks fine to me.
>
> I claim this as Consistent
There are no rules that have no text.

-- 
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
  - From: Ed Murphy

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
  - From: Spencer Baugh

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread