Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Spencer Baugh wrote:
> I answer this Yes.
>
> Reasoning:
> Rule 4E41 states there is no Rule 4E41. Therefore, we should remove it and
> all references to it. This outcome could only be averted by there being no
> rule 4E41, in which case the text which purports to be a rule should be
> removed from the rulebook.
>
> I submit the following Oracularity:
> Remove all occurrences of the text between the quotation marks from the
> Rules: "There is no Rule 4E41."
> Repeal any Rule that has no text.
>   
If I wasn't the UnBeliever, I'd claim this CONSISTENT. :)

-- 
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss