Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41

["Spencer Baugh" <dominovo@xxxxxxxxx>]

oops. Claim that to be Inconsistent, I accidentally didn't include the
entire Oracularity. Or is it still included even though it's quoted?

On Jan 14, 2008 7:41 PM, Spencer Baugh <dominovo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I answer this Yes.
>
> Reasoning:
> Rule 4E41 states there is no Rule 4E41. Therefore, we should remove it and
> all references to it. This outcome could only be averted by there being no
> rule 4E41, in which case the text which purports to be a rule should be
> removed from the rulebook.
>
> I submit the following Oracularity:
> Remove all occurrences of the text between the quotation marks from the
> Rules: "There is no Rule 4E41."
>
> Repeal any Rule that has no text.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Mike McGann < mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: B Nomic - Business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 5:47:37 PM
> > Subject: [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
> >
> > [[ I really wanted this Rule to stay in because I get a laugh out if
> > it, but if people insist... ]]
> >
> > I submit the following Consultation:
> >
> > {{
> > Can we end the Rule 4E41 tomfoolery now?
> >
> > Unbeliever: 0x44
> > }}
> >
> > I recommend the following Oracularity
> > {{
> > Remove all occurrences of the following text from the Rules:
> > {{
> > There is no Rule 4E41.
> > }}
> > Repeal any Rule that has no text.
> > }}
> > }}
> >
> > - Hose
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dominov




-- 
Dominov
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss