Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41

Ed Murphy on Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:46:29 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:44:10 -0800
In-reply-to: <478C1AC3.2050902@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <277041.36087.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f51c80d20801141641t1d502337j92bfb430d16070a9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f51c80d20801141644x1724f06xe1c4595846d3f6b9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990801141715o58fa83c2gfbe1f3b132fda87d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <478C1AC3.2050902@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

0x44 wrote:

> Mike McGann wrote:
>> On Jan 14, 2008 7:44 PM, Spencer Baugh <dominovo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>   
>>> oops. Claim that to be Inconsistent, I accidentally didn't include the
>>> entire Oracularity. Or is it still included even though it's quoted?
>>>     
>> Looks fine to me.
>>
>> I claim this as Consistent
> There are no rules that have no text.

But there might be, mid-Oracularity-application.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
  - From: Spencer Baugh
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
  - From: 0x44

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Request for the Referee
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread