Re: [s-d] To the MoQ

Jamie Dallaire on Sat, 12 Jan 2008 08:31:00 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] To the MoQ

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] To the MoQ
From: "Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 02:30:55 -0500
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650801101536v3cfcb423wce8d1b6306b2dda8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <44e5a2650801101528v70b76c0ap4ccbb2b286aa3364@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0801101531x3dd2e45fvc8197b648b20f017@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650801101536v3cfcb423wce8d1b6306b2dda8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

So I just had to check anyway to make up my MoT display, and if I saw
correctly there are 4 consultations that need to have Priests assigned to
them, either because the original priests never answered within a Jiffy or
because their answer was overturned: 71, 76, 79, 80.

Also, there is only 1 Consultation with a Priest that remains to be
answered. I am the Priest and will take care of it in time.

Finally, the recent Consultation "70" (Priest is Wooble) used a number that
was already taken.

Cheers!

Billy Pilgrim
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] To the MoQ
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] To the MoQ
  - From: Roger Hicks
- Re: [s-d] To the MoQ
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [MoC] Voting Results for nweek 136
Next by Date: [s-d] Ministry of Time Public Display
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] To the MoQ
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Active Player Team assignment
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread