Re: [s-d] [s-b] [MoC] Voting Results for nweek 136

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yes. You are entirely correct. I had added points to myself and BobTHJ for
passed proposals but none to anyone for voting. All who voted during that
particular voting period have been added 2 points except for hose (1 point)
who abstained once.

Registrar BP

On Jan 12, 2008 12:11 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Billy Pilgrim wrote:
>
> > On Jan 11, 2008 8:04 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Registrar BP, can you confirm?  (If so, then the sub-page also needs to
> >> be adjusted; I copied Voting_Results/136's figures, on the original
> >> assumption that I had missed a device-based point loss or something.)
> >
> >
> > I'd like to confirm but I feel utterly confused by this exchange :-D If
> you
> > explain to me exactly what it seems the problem is I will be happy to
> look
> > into it.
>
> I think the previous scores in Voting_Results/136 were taken from
> figures pre-dating the pair of Hurried Proposals, hence they (and
> thus the final scores) were 2 points too low for most players.
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss