Re: [s-d] To the MoQ

Jamie Dallaire on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:36:54 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] To the MoQ

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] To the MoQ
From: "Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:36:51 -0500
In-reply-to: <56732cfd0801101531x3dd2e45fvc8197b648b20f017@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <44e5a2650801101528v70b76c0ap4ccbb2b286aa3364@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0801101531x3dd2e45fvc8197b648b20f017@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Jan 10, 2008 6:31 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Consultations are no longer automatically re-assigned at the end of
> each nweek. From the rules:
> {
> Any Priest which has not answered a consultation he has been assigned
> to within a Jiffy ceases to be the Priest for that Consultation.
> }

Oh. True. Well then I'm pretty sure that there are certain consultations
that need to be reassigned. such as 71, 76, and possibly more.

BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] To the MoQ
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

References:
- [s-d] To the MoQ
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] To the MoQ
  - From: Roger Hicks

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fire sale!
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Active Player Team assignment
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] To the MoQ
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] To the MoQ
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread