Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fire sale!

[Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

But is pikhq still a Game Object?

Codae


----- Original Message ----
From: Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 8:14:26 PM
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fire sale!

Hmmm. That would make sense.

On Jan 10, 2008 8:08 PM, ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Jan 10, 2008 7:57 PM, Aaron Coquet <farfromunique@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Is there anywhere in the rules that says something to the effect of,
> "When a
> > player quits the game, they are no longer a COO, DOO or other type of
> > Something-Owning object"?
>
> I doubt it. The only applicable rule seems to be:
>
> 'A "device owner object", or DOO, is a type of game object that may
> own devices. All players are device owner objects.'
>
> Therefore, whether or not something other than a Player is a DOO is
> undefined, unless defined elsewhere. I'd say, then, that pikhq is
> still a DOO despite not still being a Player.
>
> --Ivan Hope CXXVII
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss