ihope on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:37:42 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fire sale! |
On Jan 10, 2008 8:15 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But is pikhq still a Game Object? "Game Objects can only be created, destroyed, or modified if allowed by the Rules, in a manner explicitly governed by the Rules." "A Player is an Outsider who consents to be governed by the rules, fulfills all requirements for continued playerhood specified by the rules, and has become a Player in a manner specified by the rules that were in effect at the time e became a Player." "A Player may cease to be a Player by Forfeiting the game; this must be done in a Public Forum unless there are no working public fora, in which case he may notify the Player he most recently knew was Registrar privately instead." Again: 'A "device owner object", or DOO, is a type of game object that may own devices.' Lastly: "An External Force is anything which exists independently of the game. That is, it would still exist if the game stopped existing, and would still exist if the game had never started existing. An Outsider is a Game Object representing the projection into the Game of an External Force. As a Game Object, an Outsider is bound by the Rules. These Rules do not purport to regulate External Forces except in relation to their interaction with the Game as Outsiders." Given all this, I'd say that Players likely aren't Game Objects at all and therefore wouldn't exist. More pertinently, pikhq never ceased to be a Game Object, as no rule said that pikhq as a Game Object would be destroyed. --Ivan Hope CXXVII _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss