Jamie Dallaire on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:14:33 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fire sale! |
Hmmm. That would make sense. On Jan 10, 2008 8:08 PM, ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Jan 10, 2008 7:57 PM, Aaron Coquet <farfromunique@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Is there anywhere in the rules that says something to the effect of, > "When a > > player quits the game, they are no longer a COO, DOO or other type of > > Something-Owning object"? > > I doubt it. The only applicable rule seems to be: > > 'A "device owner object", or DOO, is a type of game object that may > own devices. All players are device owner objects.' > > Therefore, whether or not something other than a Player is a DOO is > undefined, unless defined elsewhere. I'd say, then, that pikhq is > still a DOO despite not still being a Player. > > --Ivan Hope CXXVII > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss