Re: [s-d] Rule Numbers

["Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>]

Uhhh, I meant 62. Not sure why I said 64.

- Hose

On Jan 2, 2008 8:03 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That could just be done in the wiki--no need for a proposal. I
> realized the snafu of the ordering after I renamed all the pages. I
> think the best would be to leave the numbers of the rules alone, but
> change the wiki page of the rule to the three digit (or we should
> probably go for four) number for ordering purposes. That would only
> require 64 page moves, and an update to the transcluded page.
> Prefixing all the rule numbers with zeros would require an additional
> 64 page edits.
>
> - Hose
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss