Jamie Dallaire on Tue, 1 Jan 2008 23:45:31 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Proposal Attributes |
Right. I misled you, actually. I just looked again and it's the proposal titled More shelf repair that suggests adding a Success State value (not Status, sorry) of "Shelved" in addition to won, lost, undecided. So what I'm saying is just that you could make the proposals compatible by adding in something like: the proposal does what you've already written if more shelf repair fails. the proposal does what you've already written plus adds a shelved success state if more shelf repair passes. more shelf repair, i think, makes other changes to the proposal rule that might themselves be worthy, but those changes are in different parts than the ones you are changing with this proposal. except for the success states (i THINK... so if you do revise, do check that proposal first ;-) BP On Jan 2, 2008 1:24 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote: > Billy Pilgrim wrote: > > > I mean that the range of the status attribute should included "shelved" > if > > appropriate according to the other rule changes that have taken effect. > > There are some proposals out there right now which I didn't quite > understand > > but that do make shelved a status value that is distinct from pending > but if > > i remember correctly always coexisting with it. > > As I understand it, proposals /are/ shelved, but do not /become/ > shelved (they become pending the first time, historical+lost the > second time). > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss