Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Proposal Attributes

Ed Murphy on Tue, 1 Jan 2008 21:53:54 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Proposal Attributes

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Proposal Attributes
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 20:51:57 -0800
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650801012047p3adc6683jc0887706b001242@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <477B0CA2.7090709@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650801012047p3adc6683jc0887706b001242@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

Billy Pilgrim wrote:

> I'm ok with the switch but you might want to include a provision in the body
> of your proposal that says to add the Shelved status in case other proposals
> pass that use shelve voting.

"Shelved" is neither a Property nor an Attribute, and neither "Fix the
Shelves" nor "Gamble Votes" would change that.  Am I misunderstanding?

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Proposal Attributes
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Proposal Attributes
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Anti-Proposal: B-Agora Swap
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Life
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Proposal Attributes
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Proposal Attributes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread