| Roger Hicks on Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:17:29 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Use Sequential Rule Numbers |
On Dec 17, 2007 10:02 AM, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > A) Why can't this be specified in the proposal body? It could. It just seemed to me it would be better to have a rule perform the function rather than having a proposal floating around making changes to the gamestate long after it was adopted. > B) What about rules that refer to other rules by number? For example, > r3-13. That was included in my first draft until someone pointed out that 3-13 is the only rule that refers to another rule by number. I don't see the harm in leaving it unchanged. > C) Does this also empower the Rulekeeper to reorder the rules within a > section? > I didn't specifically address that, but I think it is implied by allowing the Rulekeeper to add/remove rules from sections. BobTHJ _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss