Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Use Sequential Rule Numbers

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 4, 2007 6:44 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You do realize that lots of sequential numbers higher than 0 have
> already been used for rules, right?
>
> Perhaps we should find the highest one that was used before the
> current numbering scheme started in case anything ever gets done with
> the old B database; if the historical rules become available we'll
> want to avoid confusion.
>
I would be all for this if someone had the data. Anyone? Or perhaps we
should just prefix the rule numbers with 3E (3rd Era)?

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss