Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Action: Dictatorship of the Proletariat or quick fix to the Emergency.

["Geoffrey Spear" <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 12, 2007 1:33 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, I acknowledge that. My action was discussed by other PEPs prior as
> a possible solution to this emergency. I put it forth, in the view that
> if a majority of players acknowledge a rule or gamestate - then that
> gamestate or rule is valid, despite potential rule violations.

I believe Murphy's contention that changing the rules is not a Game
Action is supported by the letter of the Rules.

I retract my suggested Theoretical Framework as illegal, and suggest
that the Ministry of Law interpret the current gamestate as being what
it would be if changing the rules as a Game Action was impossible.

I've pretty much lost track of Panic Buttons at this point but it's my
belief that there exist 5 On Panic Buttons at the moment at that the
Pause is 2.
-- 
Geoffrey Spear
http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss