0x44 on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:32:25 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.


Whatever his intentions, I assure you, he's revolting right now.

-rimshot-


Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> Sounds exciting :-) What does a revolt entail? Do you intend to revolt as a
> person or as a game object?
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 5:12 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   
>> I actually support what both of you have said and the problem is not only
>> with the refresh proposal. To me, it seems that the ruleset isn't used to
>> being under the strain of this much activity and prodding. Fix it if it
>> can
>> be fixed, but if it requires an emergency every nweek to try and make
>> progress, that isn't too exciting. I call for a revolt every emergency
>> until
>> two consecutive nweeks without an emergency occur.
>>
>> - Hose
>>
>> On Dec 10, 2007 2:54 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> On Dec 10, 2007 2:23 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> On Dec 10, 2007 12:02 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> I say it time for the Fourth Era of B Nomic and a Great Reset of
>>>>>           
>> nweek
>>     
>>>> 134
>>>>         
>>>>> or 135. Viva la revolution (and Las Vegas)!
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> I personally would like to see our current ruleset work. Just because
>>>> there were issues with my refresh proposal doesn't mean that overall
>>>> the concept can't work. I take responsibility for not defining things
>>>> more clearly, and I move to fix the bugs in the current system rather
>>>> than start over from scratch.
>>>>
>>>> BobTHJ
>>>>         
>>> I support that. We can iron out some of the bugs that have come up
>>> recently
>>> without having to wipe everything. It would be a shame to lose some of
>>>       
>> the
>>     
>>> neat framework that already exists.
>>>
>>> Billy Pilgrim
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> spoon-discuss mailing list
>>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>>>
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-discuss mailing list
>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss