Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.

Roger Hicks on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:48:16 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
From: "Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:48:10 -0700
In-reply-to: <A54306DF-FCFF-4117-A424-6BB0C15558FC@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <A54306DF-FCFF-4117-A424-6BB0C15558FC@xxxxxxxxx>

On Dec 10, 2007 9:56 AM, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Pressing", "activating", "switching", and "pushing" aren't Game
> Actions and don't have any effect.
>
I think we should accept these as reasonable synonyms. We don't
require exact terminology for taking any other actions, why this one?
It would also make things far simpler than attempting to reconstruct
the past two weeks of game history.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
  - From: Daniel Lepage

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Panic!
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread