Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:54:58 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now. |
On Dec 10, 2007 2:23 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Dec 10, 2007 12:02 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I say it time for the Fourth Era of B Nomic and a Great Reset of nweek > 134 > > or 135. Viva la revolution (and Las Vegas)! > > > I personally would like to see our current ruleset work. Just because > there were issues with my refresh proposal doesn't mean that overall > the concept can't work. I take responsibility for not defining things > more clearly, and I move to fix the bugs in the current system rather > than start over from scratch. > > BobTHJ I support that. We can iron out some of the bugs that have come up recently without having to wipe everything. It would be a shame to lose some of the neat framework that already exists. Billy Pilgrim _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss