Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.

Mike McGann on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:02:52 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:02:34 -0500
In-reply-to: <EDCFD990-8195-4A5D-990E-6D0B942211D3@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <A54306DF-FCFF-4117-A424-6BB0C15558FC@xxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0712100948m5bdcff68u1be6113258b582a8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <EDCFD990-8195-4A5D-990E-6D0B942211D3@xxxxxxxxx>

On Dec 10, 2007 1:37 PM, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> I'm not defending this - we ought to rewrite r0. But that's what it
> says at the moment.
>

I bluffed. I am not sleeping.

I say it time for the Fourth Era of B Nomic and a Great Reset of nweek 134
or 135. Viva la revolution (and Las Vegas)!

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
  - From: Daniel Lepage
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
  - From: Roger Hicks

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
  - From: Roger Hicks
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
  - From: Daniel Lepage

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread