Geoffrey Spear on Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:01:54 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Speedier Actions |
On Dec 5, 2007 12:31 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > If the rules allow a Player to perform a game action with X support > > and without Y objections, for any values of X and Y, he may, at his > > option, instead perform that action after obtaining Unanimous Consent > > to perform that action. > > As the Rules are right now, I have no clue what happens if something > is marked with requiring "X support and without Y objections". With X > support, the action happens as soon as X support is received but with > Y objections it happens after 2 ndays if the objections are not > raised. I'd say it's within the spirit of the rules that such actions take place 2 ndays after they're announced, since the "and" should mean that both criteria need to be satisfied. I could also see an argument that they take place 2 ndays after X support is achieved or immediately X support is achieved; those rules could probably use a bit of disambiguation. -- Geoffrey Spear http://www.geoffreyspear.com/ _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss