Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation

["William P. Berard" <william.berard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Le 1 déc. 07, à 23:46, Roger Hicks a écrit :

> On Dec 1, 2007 10:30 AM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> With the proposed change in the RP, something is unregulated and
>> permitted if it isn't regulated or prohibited by a rule. Posing the
>> question of "is X regulated?" may not be easy to answer. If the
>> argument is, "But this works in Agora", then would replacing Rule 2125
>> with "Whatever is not prohibited or regulated by a rule is permitted
>> and unregulated. However, for the purposes of this rule an action or
>> in-game entity is regulated if described by a rule." be the same as
>> Rule 2125 stands right now? I think someone should submit that as a
>> Proposal over there, I'd love to read the discussion :-)
>>
> I'm not claiming my wording in the RP is the end all be all of
> solutions. I recommend no one tries to exploit what they see as holes
> in the permissibility system until we can all come to an agreement on
> how it should read. My RP is just a first-shot attempt.
>

The other good thing about your RP is that, should someone attempt at 
using a loophole, the invalid action claims and oracularities system 
should limit such attemps (or actually, make them even more of an 
interesting challenge!)


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss