| Antonio Dolcetta on Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:14:05 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] Invalid Refresh Proposals ? |
While I'm not against that in principle, because after all, that is the whole point of nomic, I'd be happier if we could follow the rules and still fix this. Mike McGann wrote: > Personally, I'm fine with proposals being revised and retracted as is > and consider it to be legal. > > - Hose > > On Nov 30, 2007 11:56 AM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Do we need a meta-emergency to deal with this? Or, rather, will we >> accept that it is common sense that having a discussion about rule >> changes will necessarily cause people to need to revise their suggested >> changes to the rules and game state? >> >> >> >> Mike McGann wrote: >> >>> On Nov 30, 2007 11:39 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Gratuituous counterargument: Rule 0 doesn't explicitly say that PEPs >>>> can submit only one RP apiece. Under this interpretation, every >>>> version submitted would count as a separate RP. >>>> >>>> >>> It does say "PEPs and the Emergency Coordinator may each submit a >>> Refresh Proposal." and "a Refresh Proposal" sounds like only one to >>> me. >>> >>> - Hose >>> _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss