Re: [s-d] Invalid Refresh Proposals ?

Mike McGann on Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:53:10 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Invalid Refresh Proposals ?

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] Invalid Refresh Proposals ?
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:53:06 -0500
In-reply-to: <47503CD8.8000508@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <43b98ff40711300705q30ef620p33de17240ba5599e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4750298B.6070204@xxxxxxxxx> <43b98ff40711300740g3e3c7de3ie10d8d2663da997f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47503777.9010008@xxxxxxxxx> <47503CD8.8000508@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Nov 30, 2007 11:39 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Gratuituous counterargument:  Rule 0 doesn't explicitly say that PEPs
> can submit only one RP apiece.  Under this interpretation, every
> version submitted would count as a separate RP.

It does say "PEPs and the Emergency Coordinator may each submit a
Refresh Proposal." and "a Refresh Proposal" sounds like only one to
me.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] Invalid Refresh Proposals ?
  - From: 0x44

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Meta-RP
  - From: Antonio Dolcetta
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Meta-RP
  - From: William Berard
- [s-d] Invalid Refresh Proposals ? (was: Meta-RP)
  - From: Antonio Dolcetta
- Re: [s-d] Invalid Refresh Proposals ?
  - From: Ed Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Antonio made me do it (Wooble's Refresh Proposal)
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Invalid Refresh Proposals ?
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] Invalid Refresh Proposals ?
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] Invalid Refresh Proposals ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread