Re: [s-d] Invalid Refresh Proposals ?

["Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>]

Personally, I'm fine with proposals being revised and retracted as is
and consider it to be legal.

- Hose

On Nov 30, 2007 11:56 AM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Do we need a meta-emergency to deal with this? Or, rather, will we
> accept that it is common sense that having a discussion about rule
> changes will necessarily cause people to need to revise their suggested
> changes to the rules and game state?
>
>
>
> Mike McGann wrote:
> > On Nov 30, 2007 11:39 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Gratuituous counterargument:  Rule 0 doesn't explicitly say that PEPs
> >> can submit only one RP apiece.  Under this interpretation, every
> >> version submitted would count as a separate RP.
> >>
> >
> > It does say "PEPs and the Emergency Coordinator may each submit a
> > Refresh Proposal." and "a Refresh Proposal" sounds like only one to
> > me.
> >
> > - Hose
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss