Re: [s-d] Invalid Refresh Proposals ?

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Do we need a meta-emergency to deal with this? Or, rather, will we
accept that it is common sense that having a discussion about rule
changes will necessarily cause people to need to revise their suggested
changes to the rules and game state?


Mike McGann wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007 11:39 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   
>> Gratuituous counterargument:  Rule 0 doesn't explicitly say that PEPs
>> can submit only one RP apiece.  Under this interpretation, every
>> version submitted would count as a separate RP.
>>     
>
> It does say "PEPs and the Emergency Coordinator may each submit a
> Refresh Proposal." and "a Refresh Proposal" sounds like only one to
> me.
>
> - Hose
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss