Re: [s-d] [s-b] BobTHJ's Refresh Proposal

["William P. Berard" <william.berard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Le 27 nov. 07, à 13:34, 0x44 a écrit :

> BobTHJ's refresh proposal allows any player to cause another Player who
> has become a player within the past 12 ndays to cease to be a Player
> with 3 Support.
>
>


My bad, I realize I missed the last revision.




> --
> 0x44;
>
>
>
> William Berard wrote:
>> On 11/27/07, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> BobTHJ's revised Refresh proposal no longer repeals the device rules.
>>> I'm not certain my changes to the device rules need to be in a 
>>> Refresh
>>> proposal, and may retract or revise my proposal away from BobTHJ's.
>>> Since he no longer repeals rule 3-12 and 3-14, I think BobTHJ's 
>>> proposal
>>> changes the ruleset least as necessary to actually repair the 
>>> gamestate
>>> and pull us out of the emergency.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *fidgets and points at his own meta-proposal* We could have the best 
>> of all
>> refresh proposals, and be able to vote on the individual ideas they 
>> contain.
>>
>> On a not-so-different subject, Am I the only one to disagree with the 
>> powers
>> BobTHJ's proposal would allow the Registrar? replacing objective 
>> requirement
>> by a person's decision, with no ability for anyoen but the registrar 
>> to
>> contest playership, seems a bit, if anything, outside the scope of 
>> solving
>> the emergency...
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-discuss mailing list
>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss