| Mike McGann on Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:39:36 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 45 Answer; Blueprint |
On Nov 27, 2007 8:25 AM, Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > INCONSISTENT with established doctrine > This topic has already been discussed to the point that it's not even > funny anymore. > > Shame on you Wooble! Ah, but there is nothing that says the answer has to consistent with established doctrine. If there is a rule that says, "1+1=2", someone submits a consultation, "Does 1+1=2?", the Priest can answer false. If not enough inconsistent claims come through and it becomes pondered as is, what does that mean? I'm not sure. - Hose _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss