Re: [s-d] [s-b] BobTHJ's Refresh Proposal

["William Berard" <william.berard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/27/07, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> BobTHJ's revised Refresh proposal no longer repeals the device rules.
> I'm not certain my changes to the device rules need to be in a Refresh
> proposal, and may retract or revise my proposal away from BobTHJ's.
> Since he no longer repeals rule 3-12 and 3-14, I think BobTHJ's proposal
> changes the ruleset least as necessary to actually repair the gamestate
> and pull us out of the emergency.



*fidgets and points at his own meta-proposal* We could have the best of all
refresh proposals, and be able to vote on the individual ideas they contain.

On a not-so-different subject, Am I the only one to disagree with the powers
BobTHJ's proposal would allow the Registrar? replacing objective requirement
by a person's decision, with no ability for anyoen but the registrar to
contest playership, seems a bit, if anything, outside the scope of solving
the emergency...
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss