Re: [s-d] BobTHJ's Refresh Proposal

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Nov 26, 2007 6:42 PM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The problem happens in Agora when it turns out that the AFO didn't *really*
> win, but everyone had been playing as if it had although it was too
> controversial to be ratified.
>
> Ratification being like http://b.nomic.net/index.php/Proposals/0135.
>
The cliff notes for this proposal more or less read: "Every action is
ratified within 1 nday unless disputed". This still allows for a
disputed action to be decided by Consultation, it just does it in a
non-messy way by avoiding the quantum states and instead relying on a
non-retroactive gamestate change as part of the answer to the
consultation.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss