| Justin Ahmann on Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:10:34 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Codae's Refresh Proposal |
That's the intention.
Codae
----- Original Message ----
From: William P. Berard <william.berard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 7:51:35 PM
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Codae's Refresh Proposal
Le 26 nov. 07, à 23:40, Justin Ahmann a écrit :
>
> {
> If an action is mentioned in the Rules, it is illegal for a Player to
> perform such action unless the Rules explicitly allow said action to
> be performed by the aforementioned Player in the current gamestate,
> or, in a sentence not part of Comment Text, describe such a Player
> performining said action.
>
For the record, unless someone would care to prove me wrong, I find
this to be logically equivalent to BobTHJ's sub-proposal
"Whatever is not prohibited or regulated by a rule is permitted and
unregulated. However, for the purposes of this rule an action is
regulated if described by a rule."
That's just my opinon though, I might be reading your proposal wrong...
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss