Justin Ahmann on Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:10:34 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Codae's Refresh Proposal |
That's the intention. Codae ----- Original Message ---- From: William P. Berard <william.berard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 7:51:35 PM Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Codae's Refresh Proposal Le 26 nov. 07, à 23:40, Justin Ahmann a écrit : > > { > If an action is mentioned in the Rules, it is illegal for a Player to > perform such action unless the Rules explicitly allow said action to > be performed by the aforementioned Player in the current gamestate, > or, in a sentence not part of Comment Text, describe such a Player > performining said action. > For the record, unless someone would care to prove me wrong, I find this to be logically equivalent to BobTHJ's sub-proposal "Whatever is not prohibited or regulated by a rule is permitted and unregulated. However, for the purposes of this rule an action is regulated if described by a rule." That's just my opinon though, I might be reading your proposal wrong... _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss