William P. Berard on Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:54:46 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Codae's Refresh Proposal |
Le 27 nov. 07, à 22:38, Justin Ahmann a écrit : > Another revision: > {Append to the section of Rule 2-2 entitled "Voting": > > { > As a Game Action with 2 Support, the Oracle or the Chairman may > declare a Voting Period for Oracularities only. This impromptu Voting > Period begins once the second Player to pledge his Support for this > Game Action does so, and ends three ndays later. In all other ways > this Voting Period behaves like an nweekly Voting Period. > } > [[I'm not entirely sure yet how to fit this in with Conflicts, > Dependencies, and Vote Power. Any suggestions?]] > Would there be a quorum to be reached on Oracularities votes? what if there is an ex aequo? _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss