Re: [s-d] [s-b] Agora & B

Mike McGann on Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:03:56 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Agora & B

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Agora & B
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 05:03:51 -0500
In-reply-to: <64822232-87C8-4C91-866B-54BF29E015A1@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <200711191748.08628.josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> <200711241435.05751.josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> <cf0c2a990711241549q4ab9b52cl89c1054d7cef0fe6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200711241703.20888.josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650711250802m2bb76361q8a35456821b66988@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650711250803n1f448019i1a674918286e1f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <64822232-87C8-4C91-866B-54BF29E015A1@xxxxxxxxx>

On Nov 25, 2007 7:36 PM, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The consultation is not malformed; consultation 006 established that
> a consultation with a statement as its question implicitly asks
> whether that statement is true or false.
>
> See <http://b.nomic.net/index.php/Consultations/0006>.

This brings up a point. I like the way Agora annotates the rule set
with judgment decisions. Any interest in starting that here?

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Agora & B
  - From: William Berard

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Agora & B
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Agora & B
  - From: Daniel Lepage

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Right to fair judicial review
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] List of factions
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Agora & B
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Agora & B
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread