Jamie Dallaire on Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:02:53 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Agora & B

On Nov 24, 2007 7:03 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I ask for consultation on the following:
> {
> Registrar Wooble does not have the power to allow Agora to become a player
> by
> Rule 1-4
> }
> Unbeliever: Wooble
> Arguments: "The Registrar may refuse to allow any External Force to become
> a
> player, and may refuse to recognize any otherwise-legal name change, if e
> believes the External Force's proposed name (or existing player's new
> name)
> would be ambiguous or confusing, or could otherwise damage the integrity
> of
> this game."
> This does not give the Registrar carte blanche license to refuse a new
> player:
> this only gives the Registrar the power to refuse a name that is
> ambiguous,
> confusing, or damages the integrity of the game. Since Agora is none of
> these, the Registrar does not have the power to refuse Agora's status as a
> player under this rule.
> There is no other rule that gives the Registrar the power to refuse a new
> player.

This is Consultation Number 44, which I ZOT for including a malformed
question and because the Supplicant has requested that the Consultation be
retracted (which, as far as I know, is impossible).

Billy Pilgrim
spoon-discuss mailing list