Peter Cooper Jr. on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:51:33 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Ministries independent of the rules

Daniel Lepage wrote:
> Say, why do we need to define the Ministries in the rules at all? The
> Metaministry could be responsible for listing the duties of each Ministry
> as well, and we could create new ones directly by vote (or maybe even by
> some sort of Administrator's decree?).

I suppose it's really whether we want to have everything about the game in
one document (the Rules), or whether we want to spread the game state
around more (like we've already started to do by separating Victory
Conditions). It's kind of just a matter of preference of organizing

I kind of lean toward the everything-in-the-rules philosophy, but I could
really go either way.

Peter C.
spoon-discuss mailing list