[s-d] Ministries independent of the rules

["Daniel Lepage" <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx>]

Say, why do we need to define the Ministries in the rules at all? The
Metaministry could be responsible for listing the duties of each Ministry as
well, and we could create new ones directly by vote (or maybe even by some
sort of Administrator's decree?).

-- 
Wonko


On 7/11/07, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Is there any benefit to listing Ministers in r6-7? The Metaminister has to
> maintain a list of all Ministers anyway, so why can't we put each Ministry's
> definition alongside the rules pertaining to it?
>
> --
> Wonko
>
> On 7/11/07, Peter Cooper Jr. <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Daniel Lepage wrote:
> > > I propose:
> > > {{
> > > === End Rule Tag ===
> > >
> > > Repeal Section 4 of the rules.
> > >
> > > [[ Nobody's done much with it, and in this time of administrative
> > upheaval
> > > it's just one more thing to track. ]]
> > > }}
> >
> > You probably also want to remove Rule Tag Moderator from r6-7.
> >
> > I definitely like the idea of a subgame based on the rules themselves as
> > important objects, but yes, let's get the game going again first.
> >
> > --
> > Peter C.
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss