Re: [s-d] proposal parser

[Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>]

shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>  From r1-10 again, "Text to the effect that "any player may do X"
>> should be interpreted to mean that X is a Game Action;".
>>
>> So "Any player may revise a ... proposal ... by resubmitting it"
>> means that you may take the game action "revise" and submit a new
>> version of the proposal. The action that you're taking is still the
>> act of revising a proposal, and so your message must specify that you
>> are taking this action.
> 
> I think that is a perfectly valid way of seeing the rules.  But so is
> mine...  ::grin::
> 
> 
> I've no problem with the idea that your script would assign an ID,
> BTW, rather than Peter doing it  ... other than the fact that we'd
> have to change the rules in order to make that legal, which would mean
> making your script part of the rules...

how about we assign each proposal an external id, that has nothing to do 
with the proposal id ?

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss