Re: [s-d] [s-b] Amended Proposal "Rule Tag"

[shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx]

On 12/15/06, bd <nomic@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > I've just realised that rule tag conflicts with virtual particles.
> >
> > Fluxing makes the grab action a bit of a joke, as you can generate as
> > many points as you like.  Or am I missing the point (sic)?
>
> The new version of the prop would require that you make back at least
> that many points instantaneously in order for it to be valid. (see the
> tie-in with transactions)

That would be okay then, because you can only gain points back in rule
tag at the end of the week.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss