Re: [s-d] 114.1 Administrator's Update

Peter Cooper Jr. on Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:33:01 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] 114.1 Administrator's Update

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] 114.1 Administrator's Update
From: "Peter Cooper Jr." <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:32:56 -0500
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
In-reply-to: <71FB4940-404B-4F23-ADD5-61AC64615191@xxxxxxxxx> (Antonio Dolcetta's message of "Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:09:48 +0100")
Mail-followup-to: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
References: <uodq72qi3.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <F4500CFA-FD60-416A-8017-CD9A7D731F13@xxxxxxxxx> <uk60u2duu.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E97777E0-F2F6-4942-B59E-4B3044EC9621@xxxxxxxxx> <ufybi2bdt.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <71FB4940-404B-4F23-ADD5-61AC64615191@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt)

Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> but then I've already admitted I am the worst nomic player ever, my  
> rules are bound to be horribly broken.

Hardly. And my reading is by no means authoritative. Please submit an
RFJ on it if you think my reading is wrong. I'm just a player like
anybody else here.

-- 
Peter C.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 114.1 Administrator's Update
  - From: Antonio Dolcetta
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 114.1 Administrator's Update
  - From: Antonio Dolcetta
- Re: [s-d] 114.1 Administrator's Update
  - From: Peter Cooper Jr.
- Re: [s-d] 114.1 Administrator's Update
  - From: Antonio Dolcetta

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] 114.1 Administrator's Update
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] PROPOSAL: Tags
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] 114.1 Administrator's Update
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] PROPOSAL: Tags
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread