Re: [s-d] [s-b] 114.1 Administrator's Update

[Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 15 Dec 2006, at 01:37, Peter Cooper Jr. wrote:

> Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> On 14 Dec 2006, at 02:52, Peter Cooper Jr. wrote:
>>> It is currently nweek 114, nday 1.
>>
>> Peter,
>> I think you were required to reassign pending RFJs at the beginning
>> of the nweek
>
> Right you are, and I realized that this morning, but didn't have a
> chance to get to it until now.
>
> However, the current reassigning rule is rather ambiguous to me. Rule
> 2-5 says "At the beginning of each nweek, if a RFJ is Pending the
> Administrator shall select a new Judge for that RFJ." Now, am I
> restricted in my choices for a new Judge? Does it have to match
> someone in the original list of Eligible Judges that I picked from in
> the first place? Do I need to pick from a new list of Eligible Judges
> based on who just voted?
>
> I think I just get to pick anyone (even myself), since that's all the
> rule says, but I'm going to pick someone who recently voted just
> because they're more likely to be active.
>

Uhm, when I wrote it  I was assuming the same rule for assigning  
Judges the first time would apply to reassignment too.
I suppose I have to issue an RFJ about that.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss