shadowfirebird on Sat, 9 Dec 2006 15:55:28 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: you know you want 'em |
Don't we already have this? In that you can put anything you like in a proposal, and we often do. Just recently I saw a proposal that said: if proposal X is passed then change rule a to read this; otherwise change it to read that... works for me. On 12/9/06, bd <nomic@xxxxxxx> wrote: > shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> I would SO much rather see all actions within a single forum post be > >> implicitly transactional unless otherwise specified. If I'm going to > >> write proposals in pseudocode, I don't want it to be SQL. > > > > Blech. I second that emotion. > > It'd be nice to have this for proposals as well... interesting things > happen if a proposal goes in halfway. > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > -- Don't tell me what the poets are doing Don't tell me that they're talking tough Don't tell me that they're antisocial Somehow not antisocial enough... _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss