shadowfirebird on Sat, 9 Dec 2006 15:55:28 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: you know you want 'em


Don't we already have this?  In that you can put anything you like in
a proposal, and we often do.  Just recently I saw a proposal that
said: if proposal X is passed then change rule a to read this;
otherwise change it to read that... works for me.

On 12/9/06, bd <nomic@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> I would SO much rather see all actions within a single forum post be
> >> implicitly transactional unless otherwise specified.  If I'm going to
> >> write proposals in pseudocode, I don't want it to be SQL.
> >
> > Blech.  I second that emotion.
>
> It'd be nice to have this for proposals as well... interesting things
> happen if a proposal goes in halfway.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>


-- 
Don't tell me what the poets are doing
Don't tell me that they're talking tough
Don't tell me that they're antisocial
Somehow not antisocial enough...
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss